OFAC TrackerDesignations 2001–2026

Twenty-five years of U.S. sanctions, in charts

How the targets, the conduct and the instrument itself have changed — and how five presidents used the same legal authorities differently. Every figure is computed from the 24,027 dated designations in this database; hover any chart for detail.

The headline trend

Sanctions use has escalated — permanently

Designations per calendar year. The 2022 step change is Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and output has stayed at that level since.

2001–2016. Averaged 462 designations a year. Sanctions were one tool among many, dominated by narcotics and terrorism cases.

2017–2021. Volume roughly doubles. The Iran “maximum pressure” campaign produces the single largest day on record — 703 entities on 5 November 2018.

2022–present. A step change, not a spike: above 2,500 a year, every year.

2024 set the all-time record at 3,370 designations in a single year — more than George W. Bush issued in eight.
Presidents compared

Each administration escalated on the last

Annualised, so four-year and eight-year terms compare fairly. Trump II covers Jan 2025 – Jul 2026.

The Biden administration issued designations at 6.7× the Bush rate. The trend predates the Ukraine war: every administration since 2001 has out-designated its predecessor on a per-year basis.

Trump II is running below Biden’s wartime peak, but well above every pre-2021 administration.

Sanctions have shifted from an occasional instrument to a routine, high-volume tool of U.S. statecraft.
The great pivot

From a Colombian drug program to a Russia program

Share of each era’s designations accounted for by its single most-targeted country — a measure of concentration as much as geography.

Under Bush, nearly four in ten designations were Colombian — the cartel networks and their front companies.

Under Biden, half of all designations were Russian. No previous administration concentrated the tool so heavily on one country.

Trump II is the most geographically diversified era on record: no single country exceeds 11%.

Country trajectories

Five countries, five different stories

Designations per year for the five most-designated jurisdictions.

Russia. Near zero until 2014 (Crimea); the 2022 invasion produces the largest sustained campaign in the dataset. Iran. Persistent throughout, spiking in 2018 with the JCPOA withdrawal and again in 2025–26 around oil and shipping.

Colombia. Dominant early, then falls away as the cartel program winds down. Mexico. The one constant — cartel designations in every era. China. Emerges late, rising steadily from 2018.

Geographic breadth

The tool now reaches almost everywhere

Distinct countries and jurisdictions touched by designations each year.

In 2001 designations touched 20 countries. In 2024 they touched 113.

Part of that is simply more sanctions. But it also reflects a change in what is being sanctioned: modern designations map networks, and networks are transnational. A single Russian procurement case now routinely pulls in intermediaries in the UAE, Hong Kong, Turkey and China.

The UAE and Hong Kong now rank in the top eight most-designated jurisdictions overall — despite not being the policy target.
Policy programs behind designations

From crime to geopolitics

Share of each era’s designations by thematic program grouping.

Counternarcotics was half of everything OFAC did under Bush. By the Biden administration it was 4%.

Russia and Ukraine programs went from literally zero before 2014 to two-thirds of all designations under Biden. Iran is the through-line — material in every era, and the largest single category under both Trump administrations.

The legal authorities barely changed. What changed is which ones the government chose to use.
Conduct, in the government’s own words

What Treasury says the target actually did

Text-mined from the same-day Treasury press release for each designation — the stated reason, not an inference. A designation can mention more than one conduct, so these do not sum to 100%.

Drug trafficking collapsed from 39% of designations to under 5%.

Military and defence-industrial supply rose to 19% under Biden — sanctioning the war economy itself.

Oil and shadow-fleet smuggling is the signature of the current era at 22%, reflecting the shift to enforcement against evasion infrastructure.

Sanctions evasion is itself now a leading reason to be sanctioned — a counter-sanctions arms race visible in the data.
What gets designated

From naming people to mapping companies and ships

Share of each era’s designations by type of target.

Under Bush, six in ten designations were individual people — the kingpin model. Today the majority are companies: designating a network’s corporate layer reaches more economic activity than naming its principals.

Vessels have quadrupled as a share, from 4% to 15%. Sanctioning specific hulls by IMO number is the defining technique of the oil-enforcement campaigns against Iran and Russia.

The unit of enforcement moved from the person, to the company, to the individual asset.
Removals

Getting off the list is rare — and getting rarer

Designations added versus removed, by the era in which each happened.

Obama is the outlier: 2,762 removals, including large housekeeping actions that cleared closed narcotics and Balkans cases.

Biden removed just 0.11 entries for every one added — the list became almost pure accumulation. Trump II has resumed active pruning under an explicit sanctions “modernization” initiative.

For those who do come off, the median time listed is 7.1 years — and a quarter wait nearly a decade or more.
Implications

What the data suggests

A one-way ratchet
24,027 designations added, 4,430 removed. The list is an accumulating stock, and the compliance burden accumulates with it.
Concentration is the norm
Every era has had a dominant target. Capacity built for one campaign is slow to redeploy to the next.
Networks, not names
The shift to companies, vessels and third-country intermediaries means the list is now a map of supply chains.
Evasion is the growth area
Front companies and shadow-fleet logistics are now among the most common stated reasons for designation.